Test Design Techniques: Complete Guide for QA Interviews
Test Design Techniques: Complete Guide for QA Interviews
Master all test design techniques with practical examples. From Equivalence Partitioning to State Transition - everything you need to pass QA interviews

🎯 Why This Article?
At almost every QA interview you’ll hear:
“What test design techniques do you know? Give me an example.”
Many candidates can name techniques but struggle with real examples. This article will teach you:
- ✅ All major test design techniques
- ✅ Real-world examples for each
- ✅ When to use which technique
- ✅ Common interview questions with answers
- ✅ Practice exercises
By the end, you’ll confidently answer any test design question in interviews.
📋 Table of Contents
- What is Test Design?
- Equivalence Partitioning
- Boundary Value Analysis
- Decision Table Testing
- State Transition Testing
- Pairwise Testing
- Error Guessing
- Use Case Testing
- Exploratory Testing
- Interview Questions & Answers
- Practice Exercises
🎨 What is Test Design?
The Problem
Imagine testing a simple login form with:
- Username (1-50 characters)
- Password (8-20 characters)
- “Remember me” checkbox
How many test cases do you need?
If you try ALL possible combinations:
- Username: billions of combinations
- Password: even more
- Checkbox: 2 states
Result: Infinite tests, impossible to execute!
The Solution: Test Design Techniques
Test design techniques help you:
- ✅ Reduce test cases to a manageable number
- ✅ Maximize test coverage
- ✅ Find bugs efficiently
- ✅ Save time and resources
Black-Box vs White-Box
Black-Box Testing (focus of this article):
- Test without knowing internal code
- Based on requirements and specifications
- Techniques: Equivalence Partitioning, Boundary Value, etc.
White-Box Testing:
- Test with knowledge of code
- Based on code structure
- Techniques: Statement Coverage, Branch Coverage, etc.
📦 Equivalence Partitioning (EP)
What is it?
Divide input data into groups (partitions) where all values in a group should behave the same way.
Key Idea: If one value in a partition works, all values in that partition should work.
Real Example: Age Validation
Requirement: User must be 18-65 years old to register.
Without EP: Test ages 1, 2, 3, 4… 100 = 100 test cases
With EP: Divide into partitions:
| Partition | Range | Expected Result | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invalid (too young) | 0-17 | Error | 10 |
| Valid | 18-65 | Success | 30 |
| Invalid (too old) | 66+ | Error | 70 |
| Invalid (negative) | < 0 | Error | -5 |
Result: Only 4 test cases needed!
Test Cases
Test Case 1: Age = 10
Input: age = 10
Expected: Error "You must be at least 18 years old"
Partition: Invalid (too young)
Test Case 2: Age = 30
Input: age = 30
Expected: Registration successful
Partition: Valid
Test Case 3: Age = 70
Input: age = 70
Expected: Error "Maximum age is 65"
Partition: Invalid (too old)
Test Case 4: Age = -5
Input: age = -5
Expected: Error "Invalid age"
Partition: Invalid (negative)
Another Example: Email Validation
Requirement: Valid email format required
Partitions:
| Partition | Description | Example | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valid email | Correct format | user@example.com | ✅ Valid |
| Missing @ | No @ symbol | userexample.com | ❌ Invalid |
| Missing domain | No domain | user@ | ❌ Invalid |
| Missing username | No username | @example.com | ❌ Invalid |
| Multiple @ | Two @ symbols | user@@example.com | ❌ Invalid |
| Empty | No input | "" | ❌ Invalid |
When to Use EP?
- ✅ Input fields with ranges
- ✅ Dropdown selections
- ✅ Any input with valid/invalid categories
- ✅ When you need to reduce test cases
🎯 Boundary Value Analysis (BVA)
What is it?
Test at the edges (boundaries) of equivalence partitions. Bugs love to hide at boundaries!
Key Idea: Test minimum, maximum, and values just inside/outside the boundary.
The Bug Zone
Invalid | Valid | Invalid
←-------------|---------------|-------------→
18 65
↑ ↑
BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
Most bugs occur HERE at the boundaries!
Real Example: Age Validation (continued)
Requirement: User must be 18-65 years old
BVA Test Values:
| Test Value | Type | Expected |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Just below minimum | ❌ Invalid |
| 18 | Minimum (boundary) | ✅ Valid |
| 19 | Just above minimum | ✅ Valid |
| 64 | Just below maximum | ✅ Valid |
| 65 | Maximum (boundary) | ✅ Valid |
| 66 | Just above maximum | ❌ Invalid |
Test Cases
Test Case 1: Age = 17 (boundary - 1)
Input: age = 17
Expected: Error "You must be at least 18"
Test Case 2: Age = 18 (lower boundary)
Input: age = 18
Expected: Success
Test Case 3: Age = 19 (boundary + 1)
Input: age = 19
Expected: Success
Test Case 4: Age = 64 (boundary - 1)
Input: age = 64
Expected: Success
Test Case 5: Age = 65 (upper boundary)
Input: age = 65
Expected: Success
Test Case 6: Age = 66 (boundary + 1)
Input: age = 66
Expected: Error "Maximum age is 65"
Another Example: Password Length
Requirement: Password must be 8-20 characters
BVA Test Values:
| Characters | Value | Expected |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | ”1234567” | ❌ Too short |
| 8 | ”12345678” | ✅ Valid |
| 9 | ”123456789” | ✅ Valid |
| 19 | 19 chars | ✅ Valid |
| 20 | 20 chars | ✅ Valid |
| 21 | 21 chars | ❌ Too long |
EP + BVA Together
Best Practice: Always combine EP and BVA!
Step 1: Identify partitions (EP)
- Invalid: < 8 characters
- Valid: 8-20 characters
- Invalid: > 20 characters
Step 2: Test boundaries (BVA)
- 7 characters (boundary - 1)
- 8 characters (lower boundary)
- 9 characters (boundary + 1)
- 19 characters (boundary - 1)
- 20 characters (upper boundary)
- 21 characters (boundary + 1)
Step 3: Test one value from each partition (EP)
- 5 characters (invalid partition)
- 15 characters (valid partition)
- 25 characters (invalid partition)
📊 Decision Table Testing
What is it?
Test combinations of conditions and their corresponding actions. Perfect for complex business rules!
Key Idea: Organize conditions and actions in a table to ensure all combinations are tested.
Real Example: Shipping Cost Calculator
Business Rules:
- If order > $100 AND premium member → Free shipping
- If order > $100 AND regular member → $5 shipping
- If order ≤ $100 AND premium member → $5 shipping
- If order ≤ $100 AND regular member → $10 shipping
Decision Table:
| Condition | Rule 1 | Rule 2 | Rule 3 | Rule 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order > $100 | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Premium Member | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Action | ||||
| Free Shipping | ✅ | |||
| $5 Shipping | ✅ | ✅ | ||
| $10 Shipping | ✅ |
Test Cases from Decision Table
Test Case 1: Rule 1
Conditions:
- Order amount: $150 (> $100)
- Member type: Premium
Expected: Free shipping ($0)
Test Case 2: Rule 2
Conditions:
- Order amount: $150 (> $100)
- Member type: Regular
Expected: $5 shipping
Test Case 3: Rule 3
Conditions:
- Order amount: $50 (≤ $100)
- Member type: Premium
Expected: $5 shipping
Test Case 4: Rule 4
Conditions:
- Order amount: $50 (≤ $100)
- Member type: Regular
Expected: $10 shipping
Another Example: Login System
Business Rules:
- Valid username AND valid password → Login success
- Valid username AND invalid password → Show “Wrong password”
- Invalid username AND any password → Show “User not found”
- Empty username OR empty password → Show “Please fill all fields”
Decision Table:
| Condition | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Username empty | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| Password empty | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Username valid | Yes | Yes | No | - | - |
| Password valid | Yes | No | - | - | - |
| Action | |||||
| Login success | ✅ | ||||
| Wrong password | ✅ | ||||
| User not found | ✅ | ||||
| Fill all fields | ✅ | ✅ |
When to Use Decision Tables?
- ✅ Multiple conditions affecting outcomes
- ✅ Complex business rules
- ✅ Different combinations produce different results
- ✅ Payment systems, discounts, permissions
🔄 State Transition Testing
What is it?
Test how a system behaves as it moves through different states based on events/actions.
Key Idea: Identify states, events that trigger transitions, and actions that occur.
Real Example: Online Order Status
States:
- Cart → 2. Pending Payment → 3. Paid → 4. Shipped → 5. Delivered
State Transition Diagram:
[Cart]
|
| (Place Order)
↓
[Pending Payment]
|
| (Pay) | (Cancel)
↓ ↓
[Paid] [Cancelled]
|
| (Ship)
↓
[Shipped]
|
| (Deliver)
↓
[Delivered]
State Transition Table:
| Current State | Event | Next State | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cart | Place Order | Pending Payment | Create order |
| Pending Payment | Pay | Paid | Process payment |
| Pending Payment | Cancel | Cancelled | Cancel order |
| Paid | Ship | Shipped | Update tracking |
| Shipped | Deliver | Delivered | Confirm delivery |
Test Cases
Test Case 1: Happy Path - Complete Order
States: Cart → Pending → Paid → Shipped → Delivered
Steps:
1. Add item to cart
2. Place order → Status: Pending Payment
3. Make payment → Status: Paid
4. Admin ships → Status: Shipped
5. Delivery confirmed → Status: Delivered
Test Case 2: Cancel Order
States: Cart → Pending → Cancelled
Steps:
1. Add item to cart
2. Place order → Status: Pending Payment
3. Cancel order → Status: Cancelled
Test Case 3: Invalid Transition
Current State: Delivered
Action: Try to cancel
Expected: Error "Cannot cancel delivered order"
Another Example: ATM PIN Validation
States:
- Unlocked (card inserted, 3 attempts left)
- Locked (too many wrong PINs)
State Diagram:
[Card Inserted]
|
3 attempts left
|
Wrong PIN | Correct PIN
←-------------[Attempt 1]-------------→ [Unlocked]
| ↓
| 2 attempts left
| |
| Wrong PIN | Correct PIN
←-------[Attempt 2]-------------→ [Unlocked]
| ↓
| 1 attempt left
| |
| Wrong PIN | Correct PIN
←-------[Attempt 3]-------------→ [Unlocked]
↓
[Locked]
Card retained
Test Cases for ATM
Test Case 1: Correct PIN on first try
Initial: Card inserted, 3 attempts
Action: Enter correct PIN
Expected: Account unlocked
Test Case 2: Correct PIN on second try
Initial: Card inserted, 3 attempts
Action: Wrong PIN → Correct PIN
Expected: Account unlocked, warning shown
Test Case 3: Card locked after 3 wrong attempts
Initial: Card inserted, 3 attempts
Action: Wrong PIN × 3
Expected: Card locked and retained
🔗 Pairwise Testing (All-Pairs)
What is it?
Test all possible pairs of input parameters. Based on the fact that most bugs are caused by interactions between two parameters.
Key Idea: Instead of testing all combinations, test every pair at least once.
The Problem
Testing a browser compatibility:
- OS: Windows, macOS, Linux (3 options)
- Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge (4 options)
- Language: English, Spanish, French (3 options)
All combinations: 3 × 4 × 3 = 36 test cases
Pairwise Solution
Pairwise covers all pairs with fewer tests:
| Test | OS | Browser | Language |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Windows | Chrome | English |
| 2 | Windows | Firefox | Spanish |
| 3 | Windows | Safari | French |
| 4 | macOS | Chrome | Spanish |
| 5 | macOS | Firefox | French |
| 6 | macOS | Edge | English |
| 7 | Linux | Chrome | French |
| 8 | Linux | Safari | English |
| 9 | Linux | Edge | Spanish |
Result: Only 9 test cases instead of 36!
Verifying Coverage
Let’s check that all pairs are covered:
OS + Browser pairs:
- Windows + Chrome ✅ (Test 1)
- Windows + Firefox ✅ (Test 2)
- Windows + Safari ✅ (Test 3)
- macOS + Chrome ✅ (Test 4)
- … (all covered)
OS + Language pairs:
- Windows + English ✅ (Test 1)
- Windows + Spanish ✅ (Test 2)
- … (all covered)
Tools for Pairwise
- PICT (Microsoft) - Free command-line tool
- AllPairs - Online generator
- Hexawise - Commercial tool
When to Use Pairwise?
- ✅ Many input parameters
- ✅ Configuration testing
- ✅ Compatibility testing
- ✅ When full coverage is too expensive
🔮 Error Guessing
What is it?
Use experience and intuition to guess where bugs might hide. Not a formal technique, but very effective!
Key Idea: Think like a tester - where would YOU expect bugs?
Common Error-Prone Areas
1. Empty/Null Values
- Empty string ""
- Null value
- Only spaces " "
- Only special characters "!@#$%"
2. Boundary Values (Extreme)
- 0
- Negative numbers (-1)
- Very large numbers (999999999)
- Maximum integer (2147483647)
- Decimal precision (0.00001)
3. Special Characters
- Quotes: ' " `
- HTML: < > &
- SQL: ; -- ' OR 1=1
- Unicode: 中文 العربية 🎉
- Escape: \n \t \r
4. Date/Time Edge Cases
- Leap year (Feb 29)
- Month boundaries (Jan 31 + 1 day)
- Time zones
- Daylight saving time
- Year 2000, 2038 problems
5. File Upload Issues
- Empty file (0 bytes)
- Very large file (1GB+)
- Wrong extension
- Executable files (.exe, .bat)
- Double extensions (image.jpg.exe)
Example: Testing a Search Function
What would you test?
Obvious tests:
- Valid search term → Results found
- No matches → "No results" message
Error guessing tests:
- Empty search → How does it handle?
- Only spaces → " "
- Very long query → 1000+ characters
- Special characters → <script>alert('xss')</script>
- SQL injection → ' OR '1'='1
- Unicode → 日本語 العربية
- Numbers only → 12345
- Single character → "a"
Error Guessing Checklist
Always test these:
| Category | Test Values |
|---|---|
| Empty | "", null, undefined |
| Whitespace | ” ”, “\t”, “\n” |
| Numbers | 0, -1, MAX_INT, decimals |
| Strings | Very long, special chars, unicode |
| Dates | Feb 29, Dec 31, time zones |
| Files | Empty, huge, wrong type |
| Network | Slow, timeout, offline |
📖 Use Case Testing
What is it?
Test complete user scenarios from start to finish. Based on how real users actually use the system.
Key Idea: Test realistic user journeys, not just individual features.
Use Case Structure
Use Case: [Name]
Actor: [Who performs the action]
Preconditions: [What must be true before]
Main Flow: [Step-by-step happy path]
Alternative Flows: [Variations]
Postconditions: [What is true after]
Example: Online Shopping Purchase
Use Case: Complete a Purchase
Actor: Registered Customer
Preconditions:
- User is logged in
- User has items in cart
- User has valid payment method
Main Flow (Happy Path):
1. User views shopping cart
2. User clicks "Checkout"
3. System displays shipping options
4. User selects shipping method
5. System displays payment options
6. User enters payment details
7. User clicks "Place Order"
8. System processes payment
9. System displays order confirmation
10. System sends confirmation email
Alternative Flows:
A1. Empty Cart (at step 1):
- System shows "Your cart is empty"
- Flow ends
A2. Payment Declined (at step 8):
- System shows "Payment declined"
- Return to step 6
A3. Out of Stock (at step 7):
- System shows "Item no longer available"
- Return to step 1
Postconditions:
- Order is created in system
- Payment is processed
- Confirmation email sent
- Inventory updated
Test Cases from Use Case
Test Case 1: Happy Path
Preconditions: Logged in, items in cart
Steps: Follow main flow 1-10
Expected: Order confirmed, email received
Test Case 2: Empty Cart
Preconditions: Logged in, empty cart
Steps: Click checkout
Expected: "Your cart is empty" message
Test Case 3: Payment Declined
Preconditions: Logged in, items in cart
Steps: Use invalid card
Expected: "Payment declined", stay on payment page
Test Case 4: Out of Stock
Preconditions: Last item in stock
Steps: Another user buys it first, then checkout
Expected: "Item no longer available"
🔍 Exploratory Testing
What is it?
Simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution. No predefined test cases - you explore and discover!
Key Idea: Use creativity and curiosity to find bugs that scripted tests miss.
Structure: Session-Based Testing
Time-boxed sessions:
- Duration: 45-90 minutes
- Clear charter (goal)
- Take notes of findings
- Debrief after session
Session Charter Example
Charter: Explore the password reset functionality
Focus Areas:
- Happy path reset flow
- Error handling
- Security considerations
- Edge cases
Time: 60 minutes
Questions to Answer:
- What happens with invalid email?
- Can reset link be used twice?
- Does link expire?
- Can I reset to same password?
Session Notes Template
Session Report
==============
Tester: [Name]
Date: [Date]
Duration: 60 minutes
Charter: Explore password reset
FINDINGS:
---------
Bug #1: Reset link doesn't expire
Severity: High
Steps: Use 1-week old reset link
Expected: "Link expired"
Actual: Password changed successfully
Bug #2: No confirmation for weak password
Severity: Medium
Steps: Reset to "123456"
Expected: Warning about weak password
Actual: Password accepted silently
QUESTIONS:
----------
- Is there a limit on reset requests?
- What happens if email doesn't exist?
AREAS NOT COVERED:
------------------
- Multiple reset requests
- Mobile responsive testing
Exploratory Testing Heuristics
SFDPOT Heuristic:
| Letter | Area | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| S | Structure | What are all the parts? |
| F | Function | What does it do? |
| D | Data | What data does it use? |
| P | Platform | Where does it run? |
| O | Operations | Who uses it and how? |
| T | Time | What timing issues exist? |
❓ Interview Questions & Answers
Question 1: “What is Equivalence Partitioning?”
Good Answer:
“Equivalence Partitioning is a test design technique where we divide input data into groups that should behave the same way. Instead of testing every possible value, we test one value from each partition. For example, testing an age field with requirement 18-65 years: we create partitions for ‘too young’ (0-17), ‘valid’ (18-65), and ‘too old’ (66+). We only need 3 tests instead of testing every age.”
Question 2: “How is BVA different from EP?”
Good Answer:
“While EP divides inputs into partitions and tests one value from each, BVA specifically focuses on the boundaries between partitions. Bugs often hide at boundaries - the exact minimum, maximum, and values just before/after. For an 18-65 age requirement, BVA would test: 17, 18, 19, 64, 65, 66 - the exact boundary values.”
Question 3: “When would you use Decision Table Testing?”
Good Answer:
“Decision Table Testing is best when we have multiple conditions that create different outcomes. For example, a shipping cost calculator where cost depends on order amount AND membership type. I’d create a table listing all condition combinations and their expected results. This ensures we don’t miss any combination and makes test cases very clear.”
Question 4: “Give me an example of State Transition Testing”
Good Answer:
“A perfect example is an ATM PIN validation. States are: ‘Active’ with 3 attempts, then 2 attempts, then 1 attempt, finally ‘Locked’. Events are ‘correct PIN’ or ‘wrong PIN’. I’d test: correct on first try, correct after one wrong, correct after two wrong, and three wrong PINs leading to locked state. I’d also verify you can’t go from Locked back to Active without card replacement.”
Question 5: “What’s the difference between black-box and white-box testing?”
Good Answer:
“Black-box testing means I test the system without knowing internal code - I focus on inputs and outputs based on requirements. Techniques include EP, BVA, Decision Tables. White-box testing means I can see the code and design tests based on code structure - testing all branches, statements, paths. As a QA, I mostly use black-box techniques, but understanding both helps me communicate with developers.”
Question 6: “How do you decide which technique to use?”
Good Answer:
“I choose based on the feature being tested:
- Simple input fields → EP + BVA
- Complex business rules → Decision Tables
- Workflow/processes → State Transition
- Many configuration options → Pairwise
- New features I’m learning → Exploratory
Often I combine multiple techniques. For a login form, I’d use EP for valid/invalid inputs, BVA for password length boundaries, and Error Guessing for special characters and SQL injection.”
📝 Practice Exercises
Exercise 1: Registration Form
Requirements:
- Username: 3-20 characters, letters and numbers only
- Password: 8-16 characters, must contain at least one number
- Age: 13-120 years
- Email: valid email format
Your Task:
- Create equivalence partitions for each field
- Identify boundary values
- Write at least 10 test cases
Click to see solution
Username Partitions:
- Invalid: < 3 chars
- Valid: 3-20 chars, alphanumeric
- Invalid: > 20 chars
- Invalid: contains special chars
Boundary Values:
- 2 chars (invalid)
- 3 chars (valid minimum)
- 20 chars (valid maximum)
- 21 chars (invalid)
Sample Test Cases:
- Username “ab” (2 chars) → Error
- Username “abc” (3 chars) → Valid
- Username “user123” (7 chars) → Valid
- Username with 20 chars → Valid
- Username with 21 chars → Error
- Username “user@name” → Error (special char)
- Password “1234567” (7 chars) → Error
- Password “12345678” (8 chars) → Valid
- Password “abcdefgh” (no number) → Error
- Age = 12 → Error
- Age = 13 → Valid
- Age = 120 → Valid
- Age = 121 → Error
Exercise 2: Discount System
Business Rules:
- Orders > $200 AND loyalty member → 20% discount
- Orders > $200 AND not member → 10% discount
- Orders $100-200 AND loyalty member → 10% discount
- Orders $100-200 AND not member → 5% discount
- Orders < $100 → No discount
Your Task:
- Create a decision table
- Write test cases for each rule
Click to see solution
Decision Table:
| Condition | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order > $200 | Y | Y | N | N | N |
| Order $100-200 | N | N | Y | Y | N |
| Order < $100 | N | N | N | N | Y |
| Loyalty Member | Y | N | Y | N | - |
| Discount | 20% | 10% | 10% | 5% | 0% |
Test Cases:
- Order $250, Loyalty → 20% off = $200
- Order $250, Regular → 10% off = $225
- Order $150, Loyalty → 10% off = $135
- Order $150, Regular → 5% off = $142.50
- Order $50, any → $50 (no discount)
Exercise 3: Video Streaming States
Requirements: A video player has these states: Stopped, Playing, Paused, Buffering
Actions:
- Play, Pause, Stop, Seek
Your Task:
- Draw a state transition diagram
- Create a state transition table
- Write test cases for valid and invalid transitions
Click to see solution
State Transition Diagram:
[Stopped] --Play--> [Playing]
[Playing] --Pause--> [Paused]
[Playing] --Stop--> [Stopped]
[Playing] --BufferNeeded--> [Buffering]
[Paused] --Play--> [Playing]
[Paused] --Stop--> [Stopped]
[Buffering] --BufferComplete--> [Playing]
Test Cases:
- Stopped → Play → Playing ✅
- Playing → Pause → Paused ✅
- Playing → Stop → Stopped ✅
- Paused → Play → Playing ✅
- Stopped → Pause → Error ❌ (invalid transition)
- Buffering → Pause → Error ❌ (must complete buffer)
🎯 Key Takeaways
Technique Quick Reference
| Technique | When to Use | Key Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Equivalence Partitioning | Input fields with ranges | Reduces test cases |
| Boundary Value Analysis | Testing limits | Catches boundary bugs |
| Decision Table | Complex business rules | Covers all combinations |
| State Transition | Workflows, processes | Tests state changes |
| Pairwise | Many parameters | Efficient coverage |
| Error Guessing | Any testing | Catches edge cases |
| Use Case | User journeys | Real-world scenarios |
| Exploratory | New features | Discovers unknowns |
Interview Tips
- Always give examples - Don’t just define, demonstrate
- Explain your thinking - Walk through your approach
- Combine techniques - Show you know when to use what
- Be practical - Relate to real-world scenarios
- Ask questions - Clarify requirements before designing tests
Practice Resources
- Software Testing Help - Free tutorials
- Ministry of Testing - Community and resources
- ISTQB Foundation - Certification prep
- Test Automation University - Free courses
📍 What’s Next?
Now that you understand test design techniques, continue your QA journey:
- Article 1: QA Interview Preparation Fundamentals
- Article 2: Advanced Topics and Practice
- Article 3: DSA for QA Engineers
- Article 4: Test Automation Frameworks
- Article 5: CI/CD for QA Engineers
Was this article helpful? 👏
Questions? Feel free to ask!
Author: AAnnayev — Senior SDET
Tags: #QA #Testing #TestDesign #Interview #ManualTesting #Techniques